Why did North Vietnam win and what were the consequences?

The Ho Chi Minh Campaign of April 1975 marked the end of the nation of Vietnam with the fall of Saigon on the 30th and the beginning of Communist rule. The unite States could not believe that the war they had pumped billions of dollars and hundreds of thousands of soldiers into was in unsubstantial; it was truly a first in U.S. military annals that the country had technically lost a war. After close 30 years since the end of the war, sufficient information has been compiled to kick historians and others to answer the question, Why?

        North Vietnam was successful in defeating southeasterly Vietnam due to its effective leadership and organization. Ho Chi Minh was able-bodied to rally the Vietnamese (even those in the South) to join the Viet Minh by propagating nationalist, not communist, principles. The fact that Vietnam had been subjected to French imperial rule from 1884 to 1954 fueled the require for autonomy. South Vietnam did not have continuity in semipolitical control after Ngo Dinh Diems assassination; leaders changed so much that one of Lyndon B. Johnsons aides suggested that the coat of arms of the RVN presidential term should be a turnstile (Tucker 104).



Although Diem was the most capable leader, he was otiose to garner enough support from his people; he was Catholic and was practically bossed around by his family on how to rule, which in this suit was incorrectly.

        When it came to military ability, North Vietnam again had the upper hand. Looking at the troop statistics would make one think otherwise; in December 1974, PAVN strength had increased to approximately 200,000 (Kimball 35), whereas the ARVN had upwards of 1.3 jillion! Their use of guerilla warfare was advantageous, but the main argue was that they were familiar with the territory, something that...

If you want to get a full essay, put it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.