Pandarus And The Narrator In Troilus And Criseyde

After looking up pander, which means to minister to the scrofulous urges or distasteful desires of another, or to gratify a individual with such desires1, I gave Pandarus character much to a greater extent splendour than I did in Book 1. He is essential to the totally plot; the relationship between Troilus and Criseyde would cease to exist and declare any significance without Pandarus. Without Pandarus, the tale would be a true romance such as The Knights Tale, with courtly love as its main theme. However, with the presence of Pandarus, there seems to be much more to the tale. His scheming and plotting is one of the main elements that grab the attention of the reader.
I also noticed something that reinforced my suspicions about Pandarus having ulterior motives. In line 77, we read Now Janus, god of entree, thow hym gyde!. Im not certainly about what god of entree means, but I do know that Janus is a two-faced God. Is the use of this extension meant to imply something about the character of Pandarus?




I also set in motion it amusing how both Pandarus and the fabricator use occupatio in the corresponding stanza. In lines 1610-1615, Pandarus asks his audience, What sholde I lenger do yow dwelle?. Soon after, the narrator asks the reader, What shold I lenger in this tale tarien? Like Bethany, I found the narrator quite interesting. In line 917 when Criseyde goes to sleep, the narrator says, Reherce it nedeth nought for ye ben wise. why does the narrator assume that his readers are wise? Is he pandering to his readers, just as Pandarus is pandering to Troilus?
1 - Oxford English DictionaryIf you want to get a good essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my essay .