The Concept of Globalization In India

Thus, internationalization assumes an inherently contumacious character, continually reinforcing itself as a concept by linking up market upon market, system upon system. The farther along the globalisation line is in approaching critical mass, the more difficult it volition become for smaller, weaker nations to resist it. For this, globalization appears to some to be a process that favors strong nations ( practically(prenominal) as the US) while exploiting the weak. Whether or non this is true is of grave concern to a nation such as India, which is blighted by destitution, inefficiency, ethnic conflict and starvation.

India is a nation that must contend with a series of demographic challenges. Its reality is comprised of "a gazillion individuals, belonging to countless ethnic, linguistic, religious, association and other defined groups"; from within, voices of dissention are becoming more stir up and more frequent as "social inequity, regional disparity, and semipolitical instability" continue to manifest (Weightman 168). India's population is extraordinary. Adding 18 gazillion quite a little per year, India will likely contain more people than China an area more than twice as astronomic within this century; even if India achieves its two-child per family objective, by 2015 it will noneffervescent have a population of nearly 2 billion (Weightman 168-72).

These population trends cannot but be problematic for India. Extreme populatio

Weightman asserts that in India, "economic liberalization policies of the nineties have granted the middle class a power it cannot assume" (193); she quotes Pavan K. Varma, who observes that economic liberalization in India has feed an "ideological justification for the creation of two Indias, one draw a bead on to be globalized, and the other hopelessly, despairingly marginalized" (193).

The Guardian agrees, stating that poverty persists in spite of a global surfeit of food because global forces allow developed nations to subsidize their farmers; surpluses of food are produced and shipped to poor, develop countries, where depressed world prices undermine local farming efforts; moneyed nations increase their production and profit, as poor nations are dictated into submission (Vidal). It is noted that even the manhood Bank accepts that "the globalization of agriculture has left the poorest worse off than before" (Vidal).

However, who is constitute? DeGregori wonders repeatedly how it is that his cardinal question why we are "so healthy and living so long" if modern scientific discipline is such a threat to us has been met with so much "deafening silence" (xvii). This is surprising, because so many answers to this question abound. As The Guardian reported last summer in a piece entitled "Hunger in a World of Plenty," it is indeed true that the world has "never grown so much food and there is no overall scarceness" (Vidal)." However, it is also true that "just because a country or a village produces food does not mean it has no malnourished people or shortages" (Vidal). On the contrary, in spite of these figures, more than 800 million people are chronically undernourished, and check to the United Nations, 2 billion people suffer from nutrient-deficiency diseases (Vidal). In India, 56 million tons of grains have been stored in silos, but tens of millions of children go undernourished (Vidal). We are clearly not so healthy, nor are we well fed. Increasing hunger against a backd
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.