Thus, Shirley Wiegand argues that it is no hap that, in the film, Thelma is a housewife and Louise is a waitress. As a housewife, Thelma has been under the control of her husband Darryl in a procedure that has traditionally been blessed by men as an suppress one for women. To few extent, the same is true of Louise. Waitressing has come to be an acceptable working class job for women because it keeps them in the employment of domestic. Both women, however, are of the working class, a class that some scholars argue has traditionally been overlooked by feminists (Harman 80). In fact, incomplete the law nor the women's movement was designed to fav
The result is that men as a class have tailored and enforced the law to control women's power. Moreover, they have made women complicit in their own disempowerment, just as the bourgeoisie made workers complicit in their own alienation and disempowerment.
Workers participate in the capitalistic frame in the hopes of one day becoming capitalists themselves or, in desperate cases, simply to sustain themselves. In a connatural manner, middle class women have participated in a system of laws and rules created by men in the hopes of increasing their power inside that system. The film's explication of the problem, however, seems to suggest that women cannot become empowered within the system. Interestingly enough, however, Thelma and Louise trust on another more mythical yet no less male-dominated concept of power once they step out of doors the world of the law. They turn to the myth of the outlaw, the gunslinger, who lived by his own moral code in the unregulated Wild West.
Wiegand, Shirley. "Deception and subterfuge: Thelma, Louise, and the Legal Hermeneutic." Oklahoma City University Law Review , 22, 1 (1997): 25-49.
or or empower uneducated, working class women. Harman, for example, argues that the women's movemen
Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.
No comments:
Post a Comment