Light Maintenance Work for Older People

The continuity theory of aging served as the conceptual foundation on the study. This theory postulated how the own identity and self-concept of retirees was maintained via their continuance in lifelong patterns of behaviors.

In their explication in the theory and supportive empirical research, Toughill and colleagues (1992) mentioned that:

Continuity can be viewed as becoming supported or obstructed through public policies [e.g. retirement mandates], person health,a nd other factors that facilitate or limit economic and other options related to jobs or retirement. (p.102)

Those causes providing continuity have been stated to be particular towards the individual (subjective). In other words, for some older adults post-retirement task is viewed as offering continuity, whilst for others it's not viewed in this way. Because of the subjective nature of post-retirement career (as characterized by continuity theory), Toughill and associates asserted that a very good program for exploring the validity from the theory was through a survey of seniors' perceptions of barriers and facilitators of post-retirement work. It was further reasoned that if the theory held merit, attitude and perceptual info would be in accord from the easy theoretical tenets and postulates.

 

Had the researchers used inferential statistics for example the t-test analysis or the analysis of variance, an estimate of whether findings have been other than chance discrepancies in between groups could were made. Therefore, regardless of whether the cited findings are really valid cannot be known until stronger comparative analyses are performed. Due to this, the authors' conclusions must be regarded as only preliminary.

As a strictly preliminary consider the explanative power in the continuity theory of aging in terms on the theory's potential to provide an understanding of post-retirement task behavior, this find out is acceptable. It's well-written and logical and its deductions are well-integrated to the existing literature.

Borg and Gall (1977) have noted that test development procedures including the foregoing (e.g. use of the panel of experts as being a validity check on a constructed instrument) are acceptable in survey studies. However, the authors also state that it needs to be known that such ways don't guarantee the psychometric soundness of research instruments that would have been obtained if researchers had utilized much more rigorous test construction and development methods such as standardization procedures and so forth.

All subjects were asked to accomplish a researcher-designed questionnaire assessing their perceptions of post-retirement employment. Demographic details was also collected. Regarding the questionnaire, the authors reported that:

In other words, the test questionnaire may perhaps not be as valid because it claims to be. Also, it must be realized that no reliability testing was conducted. Therefore, the degree to which the research questionnaire is often a stable assessment index is open to question.

Content and face validity were established by obtaining the questionnaire reviewed by 2 master's-prepared geriatric nurse practioners and by 2 older.

Order your essay at Orderessay and get a 100% original and high-quality custom paper within the required time frame.