.

Saturday, February 1, 2014

Business Law

Last name 1Student NameProfessor NameSubject3 November 2007 Essay (a ) office secureer Ronald Reins cannot rightfully kibosh the reward because of conflict of interest . He acquired knowledge slightly the stolen jewels because of his work as a detective in the Lynnwood reasoned philosophy Department and in a way , this has been utilise as an advantage when he stumbled upon the tenant s car . Officer Ronald had an on-going duty with the Police Department and his knowledge about the stolen jewels has benefitted him in pinpointing it out while he moonlighted as a guarantor guard in a local apartment multiple , thus , the conflict of interest . Claiming a reward for it cannot be given to him because of this conflict (b ) No , the customer cannot sue the set up for false imprisonment First of all , she was not hold unla wfully . A store employee talked to her , made an inquiry , to which she responded hence , thus it was with her valid consent . She voluntarily showed her bag and its repress . If she was forced to go to the store s office or hush-hush room and investigated upon thoroughly , then that could be a issue for false imprisonment . But in this instance , it was completely a store s normal routine of checking in that everything is in in their store . The dirty look from the employee can salutary be considered as an attitude and to which , if the customer wishes , she can explanation to the store s management for misconduct on the employee s part . appropriately , this should be a losing case for false imprisonment . No law was broken on the part of the store . A call of attention to the employee s behavior could be in...If you want to pay back a full essay, order it on our website: OrderEssay.net

If you want to get a full information about our service, visit! our page: write my essay

No comments:

Post a Comment